논리 철학에서의 역설과 문제들 (The Book of Paradoxes and Problemes, by John Donne)
John Donne논리 철학에서의 역설과 문제들.The Book of Paradoxes and Problemes, by John Donne
1633년도와 1652년도에 발행된 것을 1923년도 재발행. 논리와 철학 그리고 의학에서 파라독스인 역설을 도입해서 문제를 해결하는 법을 만들어냄. 영국의 철학자 논리학자 수학자인 러셀등도 문제 풀이에서 파라독스를 사용함. 이책에서는 역설 문제들 캐렉터 등으로 분류해서 기술.
A paradox, also known as an antinomy, is a logically self-contradictory statement or a statement that runs contrary to one expectation. It is a statement that, despite apparently valid reasoning from true premises, leads to a seemingly self-contradictory or a logically unacceptable conclusion. A paradox usually involves contradictory-yet-interrelated elements―that exist simultaneously and persist over time.
In logic, many paradoxes exist which are known to be invalid arguments, but which are nevertheless valuable in promoting critical thinking, while other paradoxes have revealed errors in definitions which were assumed to be rigorous, and have caused axioms of mathematics and logic to be re-examined. One example is Russells paradox, which questions whether a "list of all lists that do not contain . would include itself, and showed that attempts to found set theory on the identification of sets with properties or predicates were flawed. Others, such as Currys paradox, cannot be easily resolved by making foundational changes in a logical system.
1633년도와 1652년도에 발행된 것을 1923년도 재발행. 논리와 철학 그리고 의학에서 파라독스인 역설을 도입해서 문제를 해결하는 법을 만들어냄. 영국의 철학자 논리학자 수학자인 러셀등도 문제 풀이에서 파라독스를 사용함. 이책에서는 역설 문제들 캐렉터 등으로 분류해서 기술.
A paradox, also known as an antinomy, is a logically self-contradictory statement or a statement that runs contrary to one expectation. It is a statement that, despite apparently valid reasoning from true premises, leads to a seemingly self-contradictory or a logically unacceptable conclusion. A paradox usually involves contradictory-yet-interrelated elements―that exist simultaneously and persist over time.
In logic, many paradoxes exist which are known to be invalid arguments, but which are nevertheless valuable in promoting critical thinking, while other paradoxes have revealed errors in definitions which were assumed to be rigorous, and have caused axioms of mathematics and logic to be re-examined. One example is Russells paradox, which questions whether a "list of all lists that do not contain . would include itself, and showed that attempts to found set theory on the identification of sets with properties or predicates were flawed. Others, such as Currys paradox, cannot be easily resolved by making foundational changes in a logical system.
주제 분류
